π”½π•π•šπ•˜π•™π•₯𝕣𝕒𝕕𝕒𝕣 𝟚𝟜 π”Όπ•’π•ž π•Žπ•’π•₯𝕔𝕙

π”½π•π•šπ•˜π•™π•₯𝕣𝕒𝕕𝕒𝕣 𝟚𝟜 π”Όπ•’π•ž π•Žπ•’π•₯𝕔𝕙

Keep Awake.. Thanks Eli

“EAM: Though generally referring to a category of urgent messages from commanders to deployed forces, EAM is often used as a short-hand expression for a specially coded nuclear attack directive.”

 “….Proper coding and formatting of EAMs is of crucial importance, since nuclear forces are prepared to execute any messages they receive that meet rigid specifications. In addition to specific instructions contained in an EAM, proper coding provides the means by which a commander expresses his authority to release nuclear weapons and an officer controlling those weapons verifies that authority.”

From a shortwave utility hobbyist’s standpoint what are they? Park your HF receiver (set to upper side band mode) on 15016.0 kHz, 13200.0 kHz, 11175.0 kHz (the most productive for day to day monitoring of the U.S. military on HF), 8992.0 kHz (ideal for monitoring during North American nights), 6739.0 kHz , 6712.0 kHz or 4724.0 kHz.

Eventually you’ll hear ground stations of the USAF’s HF-GCS (led by ANDREWS or OFFUTT or MCCLELLAN, identified in the clear since 1992) broadcast one or more Emergency Action Message, or EAM. You will hear a six-character alpha-numeric string (known as the “preamble”) read phonetically, repeated three times.

This will be followed by the same 6-character string either by itself (as the entire message), or concatenated with additional alpha-numeric characters to produce alpha-numeric strings that total 28 characters (the most common length; 30-characters prior to 01 Oct 2000; 26-characters prior to 01 Oct 1998), or 22 characters (20 character prior to 01 Oct 2000), or strings with character-counts that can extend into the hundreds of characters

(with the available character set universe consisting of all 26-characters of the English alphabet plus the numerals two, three, four, five, six and seven; with extremely rare exceptions there are no zeros, ones, eights or nines heard in these strings).

Source

π”»π•¦π•£π•’π•žπ•’π•© π•Žπ• π•£π•π•• ℕ𝕖𝕨𝕀

Source

𝕀𝕀 ℕ𝕠𝕣π•₯𝕙 𝕂𝕠𝕣𝕖𝕒 𝕒𝕓𝕠𝕦π•₯ π•₯𝕠 𝕒π•₯π•₯π•’π•”π•œ π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•Šπ• π•¦π•₯𝕙 π•¨π•™π•šπ•π•– 𝕀𝕦𝕑𝕑𝕝π•ͺπ•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•₯𝕣𝕠𝕠𝕑𝕀 𝕗𝕠𝕣 β„π•¦π•€π•€π•šπ•’?

𝕀𝕀 ℕ𝕠𝕣π•₯𝕙 𝕂𝕠𝕣𝕖𝕒 𝕒𝕓𝕠𝕦π•₯ π•₯𝕠 𝕒π•₯π•₯π•’π•”π•œ π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•Šπ• π•¦π•₯𝕙 π•¨π•™π•šπ•π•– 𝕀𝕦𝕑𝕑𝕝π•ͺπ•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•₯𝕣𝕠𝕠𝕑𝕀 𝕗𝕠𝕣 β„π•¦π•€π•€π•šπ•’?

A series of events and speculation has stirred debate over what’s happening on the Korean Peninsula

A series of coinciding events has prompted alarmists and incompetent experts to state that β€œthe Korean Peninsula is on the brink of war.” While there is always a possibility that any incident may escalate into an armed conflict, and the risk is never either zero or 100%, at this point there is no need for undue concern. Below, we will discuss the incidents – which, taken together, may indeed disturb anyone who is less familiar with the complexities of the situation in Korea – in more detail.

π•Šπ• π•¦π•₯𝕙 π•‚π• π•£π•–π•’π•Ÿ π••π•£π• π•Ÿπ•–π•€ 𝕠𝕧𝕖𝕣 β„™π•ͺπ• π•Ÿπ•˜π•ͺπ•’π•Ÿπ•˜

The current tensions, characterized by an exchange of mutual threats along the lines of β€œDon’t you dare, or you’ll face dire consequences” were triggered by South Korean drones dropping anti-North Korea leaflets over Pyongyang. This incident was confirmed by Russian Ambassador to North Korea Aleksandr Matsegora, and photos suggest these were plane-like UAVs similar to South Korean models.

Meanwhile, North Korea has ordered its artillery forces located along the border to full combat readiness, and launched a nationwide campaign encouraging enlistment in the Korean People’s Army. While this is a significant escalation, no new provocations have occurred as of yet. Hopefully, tensions will gradually ease, leading to a situation on the Korean Peninsula reminiscent of the Cold War standoff between the Soviet Union and the United States. We might see an arms race, occasional displays of power, and minor incidents, but it seems unlikely that either side will cross the red lines. After all, from a tactical perspective, should conflict arise, both parties would likely inflict major damage on each other.

π•Šπ•šπ•π•–π•Ÿπ•”π•–π••π•Šπ•šπ•£π•€

Source

π•ƒπ•’π•£π•˜π•– π”Ήπ• π•–π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•Šπ•’π•₯π•–π•π•π•šπ•₯𝕖 𝔼𝕩𝕑𝕝𝕠𝕕𝕖𝕀 π•šπ•Ÿ π•Šπ•‘π•’π•”π•–

π•ƒπ•’π•£π•˜π•– π”Ήπ• π•–π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•Šπ•’π•₯π•–π•π•π•šπ•₯𝕖 𝔼𝕩𝕑𝕝𝕠𝕕𝕖𝕀 π•šπ•Ÿ π•Šπ•‘π•’π•”π•–

According to an official update, an “anomaly” caused the satellite β€” dubbed IS-33e β€” to be destroyed, resulting in what the company calls a “total loss.”

“Migration and service restoration plans are well underway across the Intelsat fleet and third-party satellites,” the update reads.

It’s unclear what exactly caused the satellite to break up. The US Space Force announced it was “tracking around 20 associated pieces” but “observed no immediate threats.”

US-based space tracking company ExoAnalytic SolutionsΒ toldΒ SpaceNewsthat it’s tracking 57 associated pieces of debris.

β€œWe are working closely with Boeing, the satellite manufacturer, to address the situation,” a statement reads. β€œBased on the information available to us, we believe it is unlikely that the satellite will be recoverable.”

Reports say the satellite broke up, and US Space Command has identified 20 pieces of it that are now heading toward Earth.

Source

𝔸𝕝𝕖𝕣π•₯β„‚π•™π•’π•Ÿπ•Ÿπ•–π•

Source