ℝ𝕖𝕕𝕒𝕔𝕥𝕖𝕕 ℂ𝔻ℂ 𝕞𝕪𝕠𝕔𝕒𝕣𝕕𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕤 ℙ𝕗𝕚𝕫𝕖𝕣 𝕕𝕒𝕥𝕒 𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕨𝕤 𝕔𝕣𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕚𝕤𝕞.

The CDC allegedly released 148 FOIA-requested pages related to myocarditis events following COVID-19 vaccination that were heavily redacted/Blanc pages. Critics have accused the agency of a lack of transparency.

Seventy-five years. That’s how long Pfizer and the FDA tried to hide the Pfizer documents from public view — long after just about everyone affected is dead. It wasn’t until renowned attorney Aaron Siri led a FOIA case against the FDA that a federal judge ordered the documents to be released in 108 days, the same amount of time it took the FDA to approve the COVID-19 injections.

When a pharmaceutical company like pfizer provides absolutely only redacted or blank pages as a study, it typically raises concerns about transparency, validity, and reliability of the given study or research.

Scientific studies in the field of healthcare and pharmaceuticals require utmost transparency to allow for peer review, replication, or verification of results. Peer review is particularly crucial in maintaining the integrity of scientific researches.

𝔸.𝕀 𝔼𝕤𝕔𝕒𝕡𝕖
𝕍𝕚𝕘𝕚𝕝𝕒𝕟𝕥𝔽𝕠𝕩

Source