π”Όπ•¦π•£π• π•‘π•–π•’π•Ÿ ℂ𝕠𝕦𝕣π•₯ 𝕠𝕗 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– – 𝕕𝕠𝕔π•₯𝕠𝕣𝕀 π•¨π•šπ•π• 𝕓𝕖 𝕀𝕠𝕝𝕖𝕝π•ͺ π•£π•–π•€π•‘π• π•Ÿπ•€π•šπ•“π•π•– 𝕗𝕠𝕣 π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•”π• π•Ÿπ•€π•–π•’π•¦π•–π•Ÿπ•”π•–π•€ 𝕠𝕗 π•”π• π•§π•šπ•• π•šπ•Ÿπ•›π•–π•”π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•€

The European Court of Justice considers that doctors will be solely responsible for the consequences of covid injections because they were free to refuse to inject

According to a ruling by the European Court of Justice, all healthcare professionals who urged or vaccinated you against Covid are civilly and criminally liable.

Professor Frajeseβ€˜s case before the European Court of Justice had a surprising outcome! According to the Court, a medical prescription was required to administer the anti-Covid vaccines. 

But there’s more: doctors could have chosen whether or not to administer them, and even advised against them, to such an extent that the potential civil and criminal liability of healthcare professionals is attributable to the specific case.

The reasons given by the Court could thus call into question the disciplinary and criminal proceedings brought against doctors who opposed vaccinations, and instead attribute serious responsibilities to doctors who vaccinated β€œwithout ifs or buts”, thus also promoting the risk of causing adverse events.

β€œThe Court had to confirm, even in a brief parenthesis, that the Commission’s decisions to authorize marketing β€œdo not entail any obligation on doctors to prescribe and administer the said vaccines to their patients”.

He reaffirmed the fundamental principle of the right to freedom of treatment and to choose the most appropriate, safest and most effective treatment by the doctor, in good faith and in all conscience, in the specific case and in the exclusive interest of the patient’s health.

π”Όπ•π•’π•šπ•Ÿπ•– 𝕄𝕒π•ͺ

Source