βYou hear people say, βWell, we did the best we could with what we knew.β No, they did not.
They knew better. And if they didnβt know better, they damn well should have known better. Thatβs what theyβre paid to do.β
@DrPhil recalled how βall of a sudden, a few weeks turn into months, and months turn into two years.
You expect there will be a plan, a readiness plan, that takes into account all the collateral damage that can come from doing something like that.β The children suffered. βWhen you shut down the schools, the day you shut them down, you better have a plan for reopening them.
I didnβt see a plan for them to be reopened. And we have an entire generation that is suffering from developmental gaps, educational gaps, mental and emotional challenges. And still, thereβs not a good plan to close those gaps.β βWhen the next pandemic turns the corner, whoβs got the plan then?
β Dr. Phil asked. βWhat was learned from this? Because you donβt hear anybody talking about it, do you? You donβt hear anybody talking about it.β βAnd Iβm not some conspiracy theorist,β he added.
βIβm saying we need to think about whether weβre going to rely on science and how weβre going to react when the government comes in and starts telling us what we can and canβt do. I think we need less government. I think if they would step back, we tend to have a way to work these things out.β
When a pharmaceutical company like pfizer provides absolutely only redacted or blank pages as a study, it typically raises concerns about transparency, validity, and reliability of the given study or research.
Scientific studies in the field of healthcare and pharmaceuticals require utmost transparency to allow for peer review, replication, or verification of results. Peer review is particularly crucial in maintaining the integrity of scientific researches.