𝔻𝕣. ℙ𝕙𝕚𝕝 𝔻𝕖𝕝𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕤 𝕊𝕥𝕦𝕟𝕟𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕄𝕖𝕤𝕤𝕒𝕘𝕖 𝕥𝕠 𝕥𝕙𝕖 ℂ𝕆𝕍𝕀𝔻 “𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕥𝕤” 𝕎𝕙𝕠 𝔾𝕠𝕥 𝕚𝕥 𝕎𝕣𝕠𝕟𝕘

“You hear people say, ‘Well, we did the best we could with what we knew.’ No, they did not.

They knew better. And if they didn’t know better, they damn well should have known better. That’s what they’re paid to do.”

@DrPhil recalled how “all of a sudden, a few weeks turn into months, and months turn into two years.

You expect there will be a plan, a readiness plan, that takes into account all the collateral damage that can come from doing something like that.” The children suffered. “When you shut down the schools, the day you shut them down, you better have a plan for reopening them.

I didn’t see a plan for them to be reopened. And we have an entire generation that is suffering from developmental gaps, educational gaps, mental and emotional challenges. And still, there’s not a good plan to close those gaps.” “When the next pandemic turns the corner, who’s got the plan then?

” Dr. Phil asked. “What was learned from this? Because you don’t hear anybody talking about it, do you? You don’t hear anybody talking about it.” “And I’m not some conspiracy theorist,” he added.

“I’m saying we need to think about whether we’re going to rely on science and how we’re going to react when the government comes in and starts telling us what we can and can’t do. I think we need less government. I think if they would step back, we tend to have a way to work these things out.”

When a pharmaceutical company like pfizer provides absolutely only redacted or blank pages as a study, it typically raises concerns about transparency, validity, and reliability of the given study or research.

Scientific studies in the field of healthcare and pharmaceuticals require utmost transparency to allow for peer review, replication, or verification of results. Peer review is particularly crucial in maintaining the integrity of scientific researches.

𝔸.𝕀 𝔼𝕤𝕔𝕒𝕡𝕖

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕍𝕚𝕘𝕚𝕝𝕒𝕟𝕥 𝔽𝕠𝕩
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕍𝕚𝕘𝕚𝕝𝕒𝕟𝕥 𝔽𝕠𝕩

Source