ℝ𝕖𝕕𝕒𝕔π•₯𝕖𝕕 ℂ𝔻ℂ π•žπ•ͺπ• π•”π•’π•£π••π•šπ•₯π•šπ•€ β„™π•—π•šπ•«π•–π•£ 𝕕𝕒π•₯𝕒 𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕨𝕀 π•”π•£π•šπ•₯π•šπ•”π•šπ•€π•ž.

ℝ𝕖𝕕𝕒𝕔π•₯𝕖𝕕 ℂ𝔻ℂ π•žπ•ͺπ• π•”π•’π•£π••π•šπ•₯π•šπ•€ β„™π•—π•šπ•«π•–π•£ 𝕕𝕒π•₯𝕒 𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕨𝕀 π•”π•£π•šπ•₯π•šπ•”π•šπ•€π•ž.

The CDC allegedly released 148 FOIA-requested pages related to myocarditis events following COVID-19 vaccination that were heavily redacted/Blanc pages. Critics have accused the agency of a lack of transparency.

Seventy-five years. That’s how long Pfizer and the FDA tried to hide the Pfizer documents from public view β€” long after just about everyone affected is dead. It wasn’t until renowned attorneyΒ Aaron SiriΒ led a FOIA case against the FDA that a federal judge ordered the documents to be released in 108 days, the same amount of time it took the FDA to approve the COVID-19 injections.

When a pharmaceutical company like pfizer provides absolutely only redacted or blank pages as a study, it typically raises concerns about transparency, validity, and reliability of the given study or research.

Scientific studies in the field of healthcare and pharmaceuticals require utmost transparency to allow for peer review, replication, or verification of results. Peer review is particularly crucial in maintaining the integrity of scientific researches.

𝔸.𝕀 𝔼𝕀𝕔𝕒𝕑𝕖
π•π•šπ•˜π•šπ•π•’π•Ÿπ•₯𝔽𝕠𝕩

Source