π•Šπ•™π• π•”π•œ π•”π•π•’π•šπ•ž 𝕆𝕩𝕗𝕠𝕣𝕕 𝔸𝕀π•₯π•£π•’β„€π•–π•Ÿπ•–π•”π•’β€™π•€ β„‚π• π•§π•šπ•• π•§π•’π•”π•”π•šπ•Ÿπ•– 𝕨𝕒𝕀 β€˜π••π•–π•—π•–π•”π•₯π•šπ•§π•–β€™ 𝕒𝕀 π•π•–π•˜π•’π• 𝕔𝕒𝕀𝕖 π•π•’π•¦π•Ÿπ•”π•™π•–π••

The efficiency of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine has been questioned by claimants lodging a suit with the High Court who have branded it “defective” in newly released documents.

A test case has been brought to the court by Jamie Scott, a father of two who claims to have suffered a brain injury resulting from a clot after he received the jab in 2021.

In court documents, the father states the injury has left him unable to work, and he alleges the jab’s efficacy was β€œvastly overstated”.

He is joined by the widower and two young children of Alpa Tailor, who have lodged a second claim after the mum died aged 35 from blood clots following a dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine.

Together, the cases could pave the way for up to Β£80million of payouts from 80 different claims of vaccine-induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT).

β„π•šπ•”π•œπ•€π•ͺ
𝔻𝕣 π”Έπ•€π•–π•–π•ž 𝕄𝕒𝕝𝕙𝕠π•₯𝕣𝕒

Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *